Discuss the dependence of the "littleuns" on the bigger children. Also focus on further division in the group and the balance or imbalance of power.
-The “littluns” act as leeches
-Rely on the older children for nourishment and shelter
-Very short attention spans (one minute they are eagerly helping the older children, another minute they are laughing and playing, rolling over logs)
-Give respect where respect is due
-Rely on older children as a source of comfort and security
-Divisions:
littluns vs. older boys
Jack vs. Ralph
Jack vs. Simon and Ralph
Jack, Simon, Ralph vs. Piggy and the littluns
Piggy vs. Ralph
the hunters vs. everyone else
realistic vs. naïve
hardworkers vs. slackers
beastie vs. all the boys
nature vs. all the boys
-Power struggle
-Jack killing the beast boosts his pride (Gives him a sense of authority)
-Ralph has done nothing to prove himself worthy of his position as leader (Feeble huts)
-End of order
-No longer following the rules of the conch
-Conch was once a symbol of authority and structure, but now losing its power
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Jane Eyre Point of View Exercise
From the text:
“Hitherto, while gathering up the discourse…went to my heart like a dagger.” (62)
My re-write:
“Hitherto, while gathering up the discourse of Mr. Brocklehurst and Miss Temple, Jane had not, at the same time, neglected precautions to secure her personal safety; if she could only elude observation. To this end, Jane sat well back on the form, and while pretending to be busy with her sum, she held her slate in a position that concealed her face. She would have escaped notice, had not her treacherous slate happened to slip from her hands. It fell with an obtrusive crash, directly drawing every eye upon her. Her facial expression was that of distress as she stopped to pick up the two fragments of slate; her face then instantly changed as if she was aware of the scolding that was to come.
‘A careless girl!’ said Mr. Brocklehurst, and immediately after—‘It is the new pupil, I perceive. I must not forget I have a word to say respecting her.’ Then aloud for all to hear, Jane cringing, ‘Let the child who broke her slate come forward!’
Jane seemed paralyzed for she did not move. Two great girls sitting on either side of Jane set her on her legs and pushed her towards the dread judge. Miss Temple gently assisted Jane to his very feet. Miss Temple whispered in Jane’s ear as to give her courage; however, Jane’s disposition expressed disappointment and fear.”
Analysis:
Although Jane still remains the protagonist, we are not exposed to Jane’s personal feelings of fear, resentment, anger, or whatever else she may be feeling. Her countenance and disposition give way to her emotions; however, we can only assume what her sentiments truly are. Miss Temple does appear to be an encouraging and supportive figure, but by whispering, she also seems to be going against that who is above her and acts as her superior. In this scene, Mr. Brocklehurt is portrayed to be an enforcer. We have yet to form opinions of this man because we do not have the bias view of Jane telling us what to feel. Because of this, Mr. Brocklehurst looks as if he is simply doing his job as a disciplinarian. The plot, along with my interpretation of the novel, changes with the change in perspective when taking into account Jane’s unfortunate condemnation. With third person, we are not aware of Jane’s innocence. We simply see her actions, but also hear Mr. Brocklehurst’s accusations. Opinions can only be formed with Jane’s actions and who she proves her self to be as expressed by Miss Temple: “We shall think you what you prove yourself to be, my child. Continue to act as a good girl, and you will satisfy us." (67).
“Hitherto, while gathering up the discourse…went to my heart like a dagger.” (62)
My re-write:
“Hitherto, while gathering up the discourse of Mr. Brocklehurst and Miss Temple, Jane had not, at the same time, neglected precautions to secure her personal safety; if she could only elude observation. To this end, Jane sat well back on the form, and while pretending to be busy with her sum, she held her slate in a position that concealed her face. She would have escaped notice, had not her treacherous slate happened to slip from her hands. It fell with an obtrusive crash, directly drawing every eye upon her. Her facial expression was that of distress as she stopped to pick up the two fragments of slate; her face then instantly changed as if she was aware of the scolding that was to come.
‘A careless girl!’ said Mr. Brocklehurst, and immediately after—‘It is the new pupil, I perceive. I must not forget I have a word to say respecting her.’ Then aloud for all to hear, Jane cringing, ‘Let the child who broke her slate come forward!’
Jane seemed paralyzed for she did not move. Two great girls sitting on either side of Jane set her on her legs and pushed her towards the dread judge. Miss Temple gently assisted Jane to his very feet. Miss Temple whispered in Jane’s ear as to give her courage; however, Jane’s disposition expressed disappointment and fear.”
Analysis:
Although Jane still remains the protagonist, we are not exposed to Jane’s personal feelings of fear, resentment, anger, or whatever else she may be feeling. Her countenance and disposition give way to her emotions; however, we can only assume what her sentiments truly are. Miss Temple does appear to be an encouraging and supportive figure, but by whispering, she also seems to be going against that who is above her and acts as her superior. In this scene, Mr. Brocklehurt is portrayed to be an enforcer. We have yet to form opinions of this man because we do not have the bias view of Jane telling us what to feel. Because of this, Mr. Brocklehurst looks as if he is simply doing his job as a disciplinarian. The plot, along with my interpretation of the novel, changes with the change in perspective when taking into account Jane’s unfortunate condemnation. With third person, we are not aware of Jane’s innocence. We simply see her actions, but also hear Mr. Brocklehurst’s accusations. Opinions can only be formed with Jane’s actions and who she proves her self to be as expressed by Miss Temple: “We shall think you what you prove yourself to be, my child. Continue to act as a good girl, and you will satisfy us." (67).
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Essential #9
How do Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein compare and contrast as men, scholars, and scientists?
Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein were both desirous for success and possessed a sense of determination in the advancement of their knowledge. Robert Walton, from a very young age read about sailors and explorers that achieved greatness, and longed to become one of them. Similarly, from when Victor Frankenstein was a toddler, he read about scientists and their great discoveries. This led to Victor’s ardent curiosity to discover the world’s hidden secrets. Both men seemed to value their families. This is depicted from the very beginning when the author commences the reading with Robert’s letters to his sister Margaret. In these letters, Robert searches for encouragement and confides in her, things that are apparently important to him such as his desire for companionship: “I desire the company of a man who could sympathise with me; whose eyes would reply to mine…I bitterly feel the want of a friend” (Shelley 4). The author sheds light on Victor’s familial appreciation when he begins his tale explaining the meeting of his parents. The reader is also introduced to his cousin Elizabeth, a very important part of Victor’s life: “my more than sister—the beautiful and adored companion of all my occupations and my pleasures” (17). Robert and Victor differed when it came to friendship. Robert yearned for a friend whereas Victor tended to “avoid a crowd, and [] attach [himself] fervently to few” (19). The men also differed as scholars. Robert was a self-educated English sailor, poet, and captain of his ship. Victor was born and raised in Geneva and focused his attention on science: “chemistry, in the most comprehensive sense of the term, became nearly my sole occupation” (29). The men certainly had similarities and differences; however, because Victor's puruit resulted in despair and Robert's destiny has yet to be fulfilled, the comparison of the men's final outcome is unknown.
Robert Walton and Victor Frankenstein were both desirous for success and possessed a sense of determination in the advancement of their knowledge. Robert Walton, from a very young age read about sailors and explorers that achieved greatness, and longed to become one of them. Similarly, from when Victor Frankenstein was a toddler, he read about scientists and their great discoveries. This led to Victor’s ardent curiosity to discover the world’s hidden secrets. Both men seemed to value their families. This is depicted from the very beginning when the author commences the reading with Robert’s letters to his sister Margaret. In these letters, Robert searches for encouragement and confides in her, things that are apparently important to him such as his desire for companionship: “I desire the company of a man who could sympathise with me; whose eyes would reply to mine…I bitterly feel the want of a friend” (Shelley 4). The author sheds light on Victor’s familial appreciation when he begins his tale explaining the meeting of his parents. The reader is also introduced to his cousin Elizabeth, a very important part of Victor’s life: “my more than sister—the beautiful and adored companion of all my occupations and my pleasures” (17). Robert and Victor differed when it came to friendship. Robert yearned for a friend whereas Victor tended to “avoid a crowd, and [] attach [himself] fervently to few” (19). The men also differed as scholars. Robert was a self-educated English sailor, poet, and captain of his ship. Victor was born and raised in Geneva and focused his attention on science: “chemistry, in the most comprehensive sense of the term, became nearly my sole occupation” (29). The men certainly had similarities and differences; however, because Victor's puruit resulted in despair and Robert's destiny has yet to be fulfilled, the comparison of the men's final outcome is unknown.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Essential #8
Are Katherine and Petruchio in love?
Considering the many interpretations of love, one can be certain that “love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant” (1 Corinthians 13:4). When it comes to the case of Katherine and Petruchio, their relationship does not fall into this understanding. The relationship is unbalanced. Petruchio is certainly not patient with Kate but acts as a dictator if Katherine were to go against his word: “She ate no meat today, nor none shall eat. Last night she slept not, nor tonight she shall not” (4.1.197-8). He takes a dominant role in the relationship because of monetary motives, which is further depicted when he bets on Katherine's loyalty. Katherine, on the other hand, has become extremely docile and obedient. Her patience is seen in her submissive responses to Petruchio: “What you will have it named, even that it is, and so shall be so for Katherine” (4.5.24-5). The reason for Katherine’s prior malicious and spiteful behavior is not clear; however, she may have put up defenses not to keep others down, but to see who was willing to fight through the barriers, and that is what Petruchio did. For that reason, Katherine is in love with Petruchio, but Petruchio is in love with money.
Considering the many interpretations of love, one can be certain that “love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant” (1 Corinthians 13:4). When it comes to the case of Katherine and Petruchio, their relationship does not fall into this understanding. The relationship is unbalanced. Petruchio is certainly not patient with Kate but acts as a dictator if Katherine were to go against his word: “She ate no meat today, nor none shall eat. Last night she slept not, nor tonight she shall not” (4.1.197-8). He takes a dominant role in the relationship because of monetary motives, which is further depicted when he bets on Katherine's loyalty. Katherine, on the other hand, has become extremely docile and obedient. Her patience is seen in her submissive responses to Petruchio: “What you will have it named, even that it is, and so shall be so for Katherine” (4.5.24-5). The reason for Katherine’s prior malicious and spiteful behavior is not clear; however, she may have put up defenses not to keep others down, but to see who was willing to fight through the barriers, and that is what Petruchio did. For that reason, Katherine is in love with Petruchio, but Petruchio is in love with money.
Monday, January 4, 2010
Essential #7
Do you think that Hamlet has created his own insanity or has he lost his sense of reality completely?
Hamlet has neither created his own insanity nor has he lost his sense of reality. He is simply attempting to carry out his late father’s wishes and does this by devising his own personal scheme to act as though he is insane so he will not be at fault for any rash behavior that may be rendered. Hamlet’s act of stabbing Polonius; however, was not part of this plot, but rather in act out of impulse and rage—not insanity. Hamlet was overwhelmed with emotion and did not suppress it. This is ironic because prior to this scene, Hamlet praises his best friend Horatio for his ability to act with reason over emotion: “blessed are those whose blood and judgment are so well commeddled” (3.2.72-74). With this blanket of emotional distress clouding Hamlet’s rationale and initial motives, it is clear to King Hamlet that his son’s promise was slow to come about and returns to snap him out of his overpowering rage.
Hamlet has neither created his own insanity nor has he lost his sense of reality. He is simply attempting to carry out his late father’s wishes and does this by devising his own personal scheme to act as though he is insane so he will not be at fault for any rash behavior that may be rendered. Hamlet’s act of stabbing Polonius; however, was not part of this plot, but rather in act out of impulse and rage—not insanity. Hamlet was overwhelmed with emotion and did not suppress it. This is ironic because prior to this scene, Hamlet praises his best friend Horatio for his ability to act with reason over emotion: “blessed are those whose blood and judgment are so well commeddled” (3.2.72-74). With this blanket of emotional distress clouding Hamlet’s rationale and initial motives, it is clear to King Hamlet that his son’s promise was slow to come about and returns to snap him out of his overpowering rage.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Essential 6
What parallels can be drawn between the Pardoner's Prologue and his tale? How is this tale different from the other two that we have studied? Think in regards to the Pardoner's voice and how Chaucer's style changes.
In the prologue, the Pardoner tells of his fraudulence in all that he does. Essentially, the pardoner is called to be a Man of God, a preacher, one who guides others. However, this is not the case. Through his preaching, the Pardoner does not try to free his followers of sin, but finds means to take revenge on those who have hurt him. He preaches for pecuniary gain, rather than spiritual gain. The Pardoner bluntly states, “I make my living out of avarice”, but then preaches against these offenses (245). Similarly, the tale tells the story of three young men that suffered consequences because they immersed themselves in sinful acts such as indulgence, avarice, and debauchery. The pardoner is certainly guilty of these same sins. The tale differs from the previous tales we have read because it is told in a type of satirical manner where the Pardoner ironically attempts to convey a meaning of purity when he is obviously not. Also, in every other tale, the taletellers were personified through their stories. The Pardoner’s tale, on the other hand, sheds light on the importance of avoiding sinful acts; as he makes his living based on sinful acts.
In the prologue, the Pardoner tells of his fraudulence in all that he does. Essentially, the pardoner is called to be a Man of God, a preacher, one who guides others. However, this is not the case. Through his preaching, the Pardoner does not try to free his followers of sin, but finds means to take revenge on those who have hurt him. He preaches for pecuniary gain, rather than spiritual gain. The Pardoner bluntly states, “I make my living out of avarice”, but then preaches against these offenses (245). Similarly, the tale tells the story of three young men that suffered consequences because they immersed themselves in sinful acts such as indulgence, avarice, and debauchery. The pardoner is certainly guilty of these same sins. The tale differs from the previous tales we have read because it is told in a type of satirical manner where the Pardoner ironically attempts to convey a meaning of purity when he is obviously not. Also, in every other tale, the taletellers were personified through their stories. The Pardoner’s tale, on the other hand, sheds light on the importance of avoiding sinful acts; as he makes his living based on sinful acts.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Essential #4
Choice 2: Where do we see seduction and lust start to destroy Gawain, our young hero? What is the author trying to tell us?
Honor and nobility define the society in which Gawain lives in. It is evident that Gawain’s actions and choices revolve around such virtues, as we can see when he describes the five knightly virtues by which he lives by: friendship, generosity, courtesy, chastity, and piety. Because Gawain is chivalrous and yearns to uphold these ideals, he takes on the challenge the Green Knight puts forth. After realizing he has been tricked, Gawain remains courageous and is determined to go through with the agreement in order to fulfill his knightly duty. During his journey to the Green Knight’s chapel when staying at the castle, he falls for several temptations failing to uphold his virtues.
Seduction and lust begin to destroy Gawain from when he foolishly accepts the Green Knight's game to when he rejects his chivalric ideals and succumbs to the host’s wife’s allurement. When considering this affair, it leads one to question how Gawain will fulfill the agreement made with the host: “Whatever I win in the woods I will give you at eve, and all you have earned you must offer me” (lines 1106-1107). Gawain is certainly unable to do so. All the tests, games, and agreements included in this poem are the author’s means of shedding light on the importance of applying virtue to personal choice. The author emphasizes the importance of choice; the choice to uphold the virtues embedded into one's character or in a sense, lose everything as a result of discarding these ideals.
Honor and nobility define the society in which Gawain lives in. It is evident that Gawain’s actions and choices revolve around such virtues, as we can see when he describes the five knightly virtues by which he lives by: friendship, generosity, courtesy, chastity, and piety. Because Gawain is chivalrous and yearns to uphold these ideals, he takes on the challenge the Green Knight puts forth. After realizing he has been tricked, Gawain remains courageous and is determined to go through with the agreement in order to fulfill his knightly duty. During his journey to the Green Knight’s chapel when staying at the castle, he falls for several temptations failing to uphold his virtues.
Seduction and lust begin to destroy Gawain from when he foolishly accepts the Green Knight's game to when he rejects his chivalric ideals and succumbs to the host’s wife’s allurement. When considering this affair, it leads one to question how Gawain will fulfill the agreement made with the host: “Whatever I win in the woods I will give you at eve, and all you have earned you must offer me” (lines 1106-1107). Gawain is certainly unable to do so. All the tests, games, and agreements included in this poem are the author’s means of shedding light on the importance of applying virtue to personal choice. The author emphasizes the importance of choice; the choice to uphold the virtues embedded into one's character or in a sense, lose everything as a result of discarding these ideals.
Monday, October 12, 2009
Rule of Relationships
1. Trust is key. Do not overreact and jump to conclusions, nor assume anything because most likely you are wrong. With no trust, the relationship lacks one of the fundamental components that lead to a successful bond.
2. Make sure to communicate. You cannot expect her to read your mind. You must be fully capable of articulating your needs.
3. Spend the right amount of time with her. It is okay to spend time with friends and family; however, always make the effort to make time for her. By doing this, you are showing your appreciation for the relationship you have.
4. Treat her like the queen she is. Whether it is through speech, gifts, hugs, or something as simple as the way you hold her hand.
5. Compromise. Relationships are supposed to be give and take. If only one person is compromising in a relationship, it’s not a relationship.
6. Make an attempt to get along with her friends and family. The people she is closest with usually have a huge influence in her life and could be deciding on the future of the relationship.
7. Values. The two of you should have shared/set values. It makes the time that you share easier, because you both have the same values.
8. Prayer. As Tyler Perry says, “A couple that prays together stays together!”
9. Don’t take things too seriously. Try to make the relationship as fun as possible, but also knowing when to stop.
10. Cherish her for who she is and who she’s not. From her beauty, her intelligence, her hopes, her dreams, to her flaws, her corny jokes, her bad hair days, and everything in between.
2. Make sure to communicate. You cannot expect her to read your mind. You must be fully capable of articulating your needs.
3. Spend the right amount of time with her. It is okay to spend time with friends and family; however, always make the effort to make time for her. By doing this, you are showing your appreciation for the relationship you have.
4. Treat her like the queen she is. Whether it is through speech, gifts, hugs, or something as simple as the way you hold her hand.
5. Compromise. Relationships are supposed to be give and take. If only one person is compromising in a relationship, it’s not a relationship.
6. Make an attempt to get along with her friends and family. The people she is closest with usually have a huge influence in her life and could be deciding on the future of the relationship.
7. Values. The two of you should have shared/set values. It makes the time that you share easier, because you both have the same values.
8. Prayer. As Tyler Perry says, “A couple that prays together stays together!”
9. Don’t take things too seriously. Try to make the relationship as fun as possible, but also knowing when to stop.
10. Cherish her for who she is and who she’s not. From her beauty, her intelligence, her hopes, her dreams, to her flaws, her corny jokes, her bad hair days, and everything in between.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Beowulf: Essential #2
Discuss the role of women in Beowulf. How do Wealtheow and Grendel's mother compare and contrast in their roles?
In Beowulf, women play fundamental roles within the society. They are depicted as extremely hospitable and docile within the margins of a patriarchal rule. Their sense of self worth and purpose in life are shown to be in accordance with being of service to their husbands. This best describes Wealhtheow, the wife of Hrothgar. In the text, we are first introduced to Wealhtheow as “adorned with gold, that proud woman greeted the men in the hall, [and] offered the cup” (Lines 606-607). We see her as friendly and amiable toward her guests; however, not only is she bejeweled, Wealhtheow is walking around the room carrying the cup to Hrothgar and then immediately to Beowulf, as a recognition of rank. It was her responsibility to carry out such subservient actions during those times.
In addition, Beowulf presents certain women as monsters, contrary to Wealhtheow’s character. Grendel’s mother can be placed in this category. She plays a more masculine role, rather than being adorned with jewelry and being of service to a particular ruler. Her masculinity and physical strength exert influence upon the society. She is extremely violent and settles her disputes through aggressive means. Grendel’s mother instills fear while; Wealhtheow instills comfort and happiness throughout the society.
In Beowulf, women play fundamental roles within the society. They are depicted as extremely hospitable and docile within the margins of a patriarchal rule. Their sense of self worth and purpose in life are shown to be in accordance with being of service to their husbands. This best describes Wealhtheow, the wife of Hrothgar. In the text, we are first introduced to Wealhtheow as “adorned with gold, that proud woman greeted the men in the hall, [and] offered the cup” (Lines 606-607). We see her as friendly and amiable toward her guests; however, not only is she bejeweled, Wealhtheow is walking around the room carrying the cup to Hrothgar and then immediately to Beowulf, as a recognition of rank. It was her responsibility to carry out such subservient actions during those times.
In addition, Beowulf presents certain women as monsters, contrary to Wealhtheow’s character. Grendel’s mother can be placed in this category. She plays a more masculine role, rather than being adorned with jewelry and being of service to a particular ruler. Her masculinity and physical strength exert influence upon the society. She is extremely violent and settles her disputes through aggressive means. Grendel’s mother instills fear while; Wealhtheow instills comfort and happiness throughout the society.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Beowulf: Essential #1
What are the social obligations of a hero? Is Beowulf aware of his deification process?
The social obligations of a leader are bravery and dedication to ones people. A hero must be willing to protect its people while also moving them forward by prosperous means. In Beowulf it is said that Scyld Scefing “terrified his foes…until the men of every neighboring tribe…were obliged to obey him and pay him tribute” (Lines 6-10). It is clear that a leader must be willing to destroy those against him and his people and in return acquire “praise and honor” (Line 8). Also, a leader must be valiant in military battles, which can be attributed to Hrothgar. He “won honor in war, glory in battle, and so ensured his followers’ support” (Line 64-66). Due to his willingness to give of himself in war, it can be understood that a hero must be other-centered in order to ensure safety among his community. A leader must also be stern yet compassionate, bold yet kind, and give orders but also be considerate. Furthermore, we can come to the conclusion that through such social obligations, he “who wins renown will always prosper among any people” (Line 24-25).
Beowulf is certainly aware of his deification process. However, unlike several men, Beowulf has a sense of humility in his acknowledgment of his deification process. In the beginning of the poem, “Beowulf searched out the bravest of the Geats, asked them to go with him” (Lines 205-206). If he was not aware of his honor and might, Beowulf would have not made such a long journey in order to be of service to Hrothgar. Beowulf explains that he has come “with most honorable intentions” (Line 265) which sheds light on his modest disposition and also his confidence in the fact that he can be of great aid. Beowulf’s daring and poised nature certainly gives way to the understanding that he is indeed aware of his becoming idealized and adored.
The social obligations of a leader are bravery and dedication to ones people. A hero must be willing to protect its people while also moving them forward by prosperous means. In Beowulf it is said that Scyld Scefing “terrified his foes…until the men of every neighboring tribe…were obliged to obey him and pay him tribute” (Lines 6-10). It is clear that a leader must be willing to destroy those against him and his people and in return acquire “praise and honor” (Line 8). Also, a leader must be valiant in military battles, which can be attributed to Hrothgar. He “won honor in war, glory in battle, and so ensured his followers’ support” (Line 64-66). Due to his willingness to give of himself in war, it can be understood that a hero must be other-centered in order to ensure safety among his community. A leader must also be stern yet compassionate, bold yet kind, and give orders but also be considerate. Furthermore, we can come to the conclusion that through such social obligations, he “who wins renown will always prosper among any people” (Line 24-25).
Beowulf is certainly aware of his deification process. However, unlike several men, Beowulf has a sense of humility in his acknowledgment of his deification process. In the beginning of the poem, “Beowulf searched out the bravest of the Geats, asked them to go with him” (Lines 205-206). If he was not aware of his honor and might, Beowulf would have not made such a long journey in order to be of service to Hrothgar. Beowulf explains that he has come “with most honorable intentions” (Line 265) which sheds light on his modest disposition and also his confidence in the fact that he can be of great aid. Beowulf’s daring and poised nature certainly gives way to the understanding that he is indeed aware of his becoming idealized and adored.
Monday, April 27, 2009
Pride and Prejudice Essay
Macda Gerard
AP English 11: Mr. George
17 April 2009
Pride & Prejudice Essay
In “a world of social, moral and economic stability…where characters are free to make their own choices and pursue their hearts’ desires” (Austen XIII) happiness is rare. Throughout the novel Pride and Prejudice, the world of valuing social stability and making choices stimulates the emerging of marital motives. Society does not provide many choices for unmarried women as they age, which forces many to seek marriage with the understanding that contentment may later arrive as long as they are secured. Through acting on their hearts’ desires, some women hold a disposition that attract them to pursue a mercenary marriage or perhaps a prudential marriage in order to insure security; however, a marriage based on love is most favorable and results in security but also ultimate happiness.
In the novel, women are highly encouraged to marry as soon as possible: “Young women should always be properly guarded and attended, according to their situation in life” (Austen 208). Women did not commonly receive inheritance from their fathers; instead, entails were often passed down to the sons of families. With the lack of pecuniary aid, it created limited options for a comfortable single lifestyle. This entailed living with relatives as a dependent or residing with employers and taking on jobs such as a teacher or housekeeper. Many women sought eagerly to marry in order to avoid such inauspicious lifestyles and gain security through finances and beneficial rewards. Marriage became the only way out of said situations often resulting in desperation to gain a husband through financial and practical motives.
Many characters were willing to marry simply because marriage was the only means of obtaining financial security. Throughout the novel, Wickham is clearly demonstrated as having motives pertaining to money or other rewards for marrying. When speaking of Wickham’s relations with Miss King, it is evident that he simply wanted her for a financial gain: “But he paid her not the smallest attention till her grandfather’s death made her mistress of this fortune?” Furthermore, in regards to Wickham’s relationship with Lydia, it is evident that he had no intention of marrying her. However, the rogue married Lydia after Darcy offered an amount of money that would guarantee him an opportunity for a job and the absolution of debts. Wickham certainly was not alone in his mercenary beliefs.
Mrs. Bennet certainly had mercenary motives pertaining to her daughters. She felt it was her ultimate purpose to marry her daughters solely to their advantage. However, in doing so, she was depicted as extremely shallow and insatiable: “[Mrs. Bennett’s] thoughts and her words ran wholly on those attendants of elegant nuptials, fine muslins, new carriages, and servants" (226). And on Elizabeth's marriage she exclaims: "What pin-money, what jewels, what carriages you will have! ... A house in town! ... Ten thousand a year!” (365-366). Mrs. Bennet ceased to judge by first impression or civility and solely took into account how much the men were worth, which would be the crux of her judgment toward the men. Contrary to seeking pecuniary aid from marriage, many also look to practical matters as well.
A prudent marriage implies that there is a practical sense to the union. Many seek to marry for prudent motives with the sole intention of being content and satisfied. Mr. Collins exemplifies these motives through his initial proposal to Lizzy: “I think it a right thing for every clergyman in easy circumstances (like myself) to set the example of matrimony in his parish” (105). Throughout the desperate attempts to acquire her approval, Mr. Collins does not once mention love. This was simply a pretense of passion working as a masquerade for his practical desire of marriage. This clearly demonstrates that his sole purpose of obtaining a wife was to ensure that she was provided for, disregarding emotion within the marriage.
Charlotte seeks a prudent marriage as a way of securing her lasting contentment. This is clearly expressed by Charlotte, whose pragmatic views on marrying are articulated countless times: “Without thinking highly either of men or of matrimony, marriage had always been her object; it was the only honorable provision for well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want” (122). In marrying Mr. Collins, she achieves this but does not expect ultimate happiness: “Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of choice” (24). Her intent of marrying was not to achieve extreme happiness but to achieve satisfaction. While this may indeed be sensible, other motives for marrying may result in a more gratifying end.
Marrying for love is certainly prevalent among characters in the novel. Bingley and Jane traveled a long journey before attaining their ultimate happiness. Due to the fact that Bingley was in love with Jane, he did not hesitate to step down from his high social standing to meet hers. However, because of a misunderstanding, Jane and Bingley were separated, causing Jane great sorrow. Later on, Bingley took it upon himself to return and continue his courtship of Jane. He proposed to her choosing to disregard any opinions his sisters may have had. Regardless of what may have seeped through the cracks of their love, it is genuine and will remain unchanged.
The greatest illustration of ultimate happiness is demonstrated through Darcy’s strive for Lizzy’s hand in marriage. Darcy’s love did not act as a motive solely to marry her, but also pushed him to overcoming obstacles. With a shaky start beginning at the Meryton Ball, “She is tolerable; but not handsome enough to tempt me” (13), prejudices arose and trickled throughout their relationship. Nevertheless, Darcy proves his undying love for Lizzy by humbling himself and paying for Lydia and Wickham’s marriage, along with paying for Wickham’s debt, and providing him with a job despite the fact that Darcy loathes him. Darcy disregards the disapproval of others and sets aside the fact that he is of a higher social standing and proclaims his love to Lizzy by proposing.
In both love marriages, Bingley and Darcy undergo leaps and bounds to achieve their goal of obtaining a wife that completes them. In regards to Jane and Lizzy, not only do love marriages bestow a sense of enduring happiness upon each couples, it also provides them with lasting contentment and financial security. All had to face ridicule at some point; however, their love prevails over all condemnation. Love marriages result in ultimate happiness and more, whereas prudential and mercenary marriages tend to border contentment and certainly never come into proximity of the ultimate happiness and contentment experienced in love marriages. “Love is the condition in which happiness of another person is essential to your own.” (Robert Heinlein). Love trumps all.
AP English 11: Mr. George
17 April 2009
Pride & Prejudice Essay
In “a world of social, moral and economic stability…where characters are free to make their own choices and pursue their hearts’ desires” (Austen XIII) happiness is rare. Throughout the novel Pride and Prejudice, the world of valuing social stability and making choices stimulates the emerging of marital motives. Society does not provide many choices for unmarried women as they age, which forces many to seek marriage with the understanding that contentment may later arrive as long as they are secured. Through acting on their hearts’ desires, some women hold a disposition that attract them to pursue a mercenary marriage or perhaps a prudential marriage in order to insure security; however, a marriage based on love is most favorable and results in security but also ultimate happiness.
In the novel, women are highly encouraged to marry as soon as possible: “Young women should always be properly guarded and attended, according to their situation in life” (Austen 208). Women did not commonly receive inheritance from their fathers; instead, entails were often passed down to the sons of families. With the lack of pecuniary aid, it created limited options for a comfortable single lifestyle. This entailed living with relatives as a dependent or residing with employers and taking on jobs such as a teacher or housekeeper. Many women sought eagerly to marry in order to avoid such inauspicious lifestyles and gain security through finances and beneficial rewards. Marriage became the only way out of said situations often resulting in desperation to gain a husband through financial and practical motives.
Many characters were willing to marry simply because marriage was the only means of obtaining financial security. Throughout the novel, Wickham is clearly demonstrated as having motives pertaining to money or other rewards for marrying. When speaking of Wickham’s relations with Miss King, it is evident that he simply wanted her for a financial gain: “But he paid her not the smallest attention till her grandfather’s death made her mistress of this fortune?” Furthermore, in regards to Wickham’s relationship with Lydia, it is evident that he had no intention of marrying her. However, the rogue married Lydia after Darcy offered an amount of money that would guarantee him an opportunity for a job and the absolution of debts. Wickham certainly was not alone in his mercenary beliefs.
Mrs. Bennet certainly had mercenary motives pertaining to her daughters. She felt it was her ultimate purpose to marry her daughters solely to their advantage. However, in doing so, she was depicted as extremely shallow and insatiable: “[Mrs. Bennett’s] thoughts and her words ran wholly on those attendants of elegant nuptials, fine muslins, new carriages, and servants" (226). And on Elizabeth's marriage she exclaims: "What pin-money, what jewels, what carriages you will have! ... A house in town! ... Ten thousand a year!” (365-366). Mrs. Bennet ceased to judge by first impression or civility and solely took into account how much the men were worth, which would be the crux of her judgment toward the men. Contrary to seeking pecuniary aid from marriage, many also look to practical matters as well.
A prudent marriage implies that there is a practical sense to the union. Many seek to marry for prudent motives with the sole intention of being content and satisfied. Mr. Collins exemplifies these motives through his initial proposal to Lizzy: “I think it a right thing for every clergyman in easy circumstances (like myself) to set the example of matrimony in his parish” (105). Throughout the desperate attempts to acquire her approval, Mr. Collins does not once mention love. This was simply a pretense of passion working as a masquerade for his practical desire of marriage. This clearly demonstrates that his sole purpose of obtaining a wife was to ensure that she was provided for, disregarding emotion within the marriage.
Charlotte seeks a prudent marriage as a way of securing her lasting contentment. This is clearly expressed by Charlotte, whose pragmatic views on marrying are articulated countless times: “Without thinking highly either of men or of matrimony, marriage had always been her object; it was the only honorable provision for well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want” (122). In marrying Mr. Collins, she achieves this but does not expect ultimate happiness: “Happiness in marriage is entirely a matter of choice” (24). Her intent of marrying was not to achieve extreme happiness but to achieve satisfaction. While this may indeed be sensible, other motives for marrying may result in a more gratifying end.
Marrying for love is certainly prevalent among characters in the novel. Bingley and Jane traveled a long journey before attaining their ultimate happiness. Due to the fact that Bingley was in love with Jane, he did not hesitate to step down from his high social standing to meet hers. However, because of a misunderstanding, Jane and Bingley were separated, causing Jane great sorrow. Later on, Bingley took it upon himself to return and continue his courtship of Jane. He proposed to her choosing to disregard any opinions his sisters may have had. Regardless of what may have seeped through the cracks of their love, it is genuine and will remain unchanged.
The greatest illustration of ultimate happiness is demonstrated through Darcy’s strive for Lizzy’s hand in marriage. Darcy’s love did not act as a motive solely to marry her, but also pushed him to overcoming obstacles. With a shaky start beginning at the Meryton Ball, “She is tolerable; but not handsome enough to tempt me” (13), prejudices arose and trickled throughout their relationship. Nevertheless, Darcy proves his undying love for Lizzy by humbling himself and paying for Lydia and Wickham’s marriage, along with paying for Wickham’s debt, and providing him with a job despite the fact that Darcy loathes him. Darcy disregards the disapproval of others and sets aside the fact that he is of a higher social standing and proclaims his love to Lizzy by proposing.
In both love marriages, Bingley and Darcy undergo leaps and bounds to achieve their goal of obtaining a wife that completes them. In regards to Jane and Lizzy, not only do love marriages bestow a sense of enduring happiness upon each couples, it also provides them with lasting contentment and financial security. All had to face ridicule at some point; however, their love prevails over all condemnation. Love marriages result in ultimate happiness and more, whereas prudential and mercenary marriages tend to border contentment and certainly never come into proximity of the ultimate happiness and contentment experienced in love marriages. “Love is the condition in which happiness of another person is essential to your own.” (Robert Heinlein). Love trumps all.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Lady Catherine
Lady Catherine’s overbearing behavior proved to be a direct reflection of how highly she valued the ludicrous and absurd class system making her apathetic to the opinions of others.
If one were to approach Lady Catherine, it would not be out of the ordinary if she were to treat the person as if he were her footstool. Lady Catherine’s high ranking in the class system gave her the understanding that she may treat anyone as she pleased. This snobbish heiress assumed everyone would treat her with utmost reverence; however, Elizabeth shattered this fantasy after Lady Catherine attempted to discourage Darcy and Elizabeth’s engagement: “Lady Catherine seemed quite astonished at not receiving a direct answer; and Elizabeth suspected herself to be the first creature who had ever dared to trifle with so much dignified impertinence” (Austen 165). Lady Catherine was not accustomed to having her judgment questioned, and often took it upon herself to inquire in an offensive manner about subject matters that were none of her business. Embodying the most perverse form of pomposity, she valued those who consistently flattered and praised her opinions regardless of if they were the most irrational and unfair remarks one has ever heard.
Lady Catherine is like a peacock. Just as Lady Catherine flaunts her affluence and high social status to maintain a sense of superiority, a peacock flares out brilliant tail feathers for all to see. It comes across as extremely ostentatious to such an extent that it belittles others around. With every strut, either a sense of jealousy or admiration is evoked through what or in Lady Catherine’s case, who, is around. Also, in order to obtain attention, a loud obnoxious cry is often emitted, which certainly applies to Lady Catherine’s consistent need to obnoxiously comment on what has absolutely nothing to do with her.
Arrogance is to Lady Catherine as egocentricity is to P Diddy in that both feel as though all must grovel for their approbation believing that whatever they say is law.
If one were to approach Lady Catherine, it would not be out of the ordinary if she were to treat the person as if he were her footstool. Lady Catherine’s high ranking in the class system gave her the understanding that she may treat anyone as she pleased. This snobbish heiress assumed everyone would treat her with utmost reverence; however, Elizabeth shattered this fantasy after Lady Catherine attempted to discourage Darcy and Elizabeth’s engagement: “Lady Catherine seemed quite astonished at not receiving a direct answer; and Elizabeth suspected herself to be the first creature who had ever dared to trifle with so much dignified impertinence” (Austen 165). Lady Catherine was not accustomed to having her judgment questioned, and often took it upon herself to inquire in an offensive manner about subject matters that were none of her business. Embodying the most perverse form of pomposity, she valued those who consistently flattered and praised her opinions regardless of if they were the most irrational and unfair remarks one has ever heard.
Lady Catherine is like a peacock. Just as Lady Catherine flaunts her affluence and high social status to maintain a sense of superiority, a peacock flares out brilliant tail feathers for all to see. It comes across as extremely ostentatious to such an extent that it belittles others around. With every strut, either a sense of jealousy or admiration is evoked through what or in Lady Catherine’s case, who, is around. Also, in order to obtain attention, a loud obnoxious cry is often emitted, which certainly applies to Lady Catherine’s consistent need to obnoxiously comment on what has absolutely nothing to do with her.
Arrogance is to Lady Catherine as egocentricity is to P Diddy in that both feel as though all must grovel for their approbation believing that whatever they say is law.
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist of Pride and Prejudice, was known for being the wittiest, most insightful, and most intelligent amongst her sisters.
Elizabeth held qualities of lively wit, honesty, and frankness that enabled her to stand apart from her family and rise above the haughty and condescending behavior that existed in such a classist society. Elizabeth is seen as an insightful and levelheaded sister who sees people for who they really are. She acts as a driving force that attempts to have Jane, her older sister, see others in the same light and dissuade her from thinking that "all the world is respectable" (Austen 134). Despite Elizabeth’s virtues, she also had a tendency to formulate unfair judgments on first impressions, which would result in disaster in regards to her relationship with Mr. Darcy. Elizabeth’s candor and first impression of Darcy forces her to reject Darcy’s initial marriage proposal. However, as she gradually came to recognize the rectitude of Darcy’s motives, she also came to terms with the error of her false judgment of his character.
Elizabeth is like a lie detector. Just as Elizabeth is confident and can easily see the inconsistency of human beings, the lie detector can determine what is true and what is false. Lie detectors, however, hold a certain percentage of accuracy in their calculations along with a percentage of possible error. In regards to Elizabeth, at times, correct judgments were made; nevertheless, erroneous judgments also came about. Though lie detectors hold the accountability for being correct and induce a confidence among its users, they can be flawed.
Frankness is to Elizabeth what honesty is to Oprah in that both women have the confidence to be outspoken and exert their opinions regardless of what others think of them.
Elizabeth held qualities of lively wit, honesty, and frankness that enabled her to stand apart from her family and rise above the haughty and condescending behavior that existed in such a classist society. Elizabeth is seen as an insightful and levelheaded sister who sees people for who they really are. She acts as a driving force that attempts to have Jane, her older sister, see others in the same light and dissuade her from thinking that "all the world is respectable" (Austen 134). Despite Elizabeth’s virtues, she also had a tendency to formulate unfair judgments on first impressions, which would result in disaster in regards to her relationship with Mr. Darcy. Elizabeth’s candor and first impression of Darcy forces her to reject Darcy’s initial marriage proposal. However, as she gradually came to recognize the rectitude of Darcy’s motives, she also came to terms with the error of her false judgment of his character.
Elizabeth is like a lie detector. Just as Elizabeth is confident and can easily see the inconsistency of human beings, the lie detector can determine what is true and what is false. Lie detectors, however, hold a certain percentage of accuracy in their calculations along with a percentage of possible error. In regards to Elizabeth, at times, correct judgments were made; nevertheless, erroneous judgments also came about. Though lie detectors hold the accountability for being correct and induce a confidence among its users, they can be flawed.
Frankness is to Elizabeth what honesty is to Oprah in that both women have the confidence to be outspoken and exert their opinions regardless of what others think of them.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
P&P #13: Ch. 10-12
“ I fancy, Lizzy, that obstinacy is the real defect of his character after all” (313).
- In the past few chapters, Darcy is depicted as more than perfect, to the point where even one negative trait results in good actions. Rather than be a play on words, this quotation could be considered as a play on “comprehension”. Darcy insists that he personally provide Mr. Wickham and Lydia with pecuniary aid. After doing so, Darcy was also adamant in regards to making Mr. Gardiner take the credit for such a good deed. Obstinacy is often understood to be a negative or haughty characteristic. It is usually deemed as disrespectful or condescending. However, within the context, it is evident that obstinacy becomes a form of humility. Austen elucidates the reasoning behind Darcy’s obstinacy, which forces the reader to conclude that the sole “defect” Darcy possesses results in positive and constructive works which makes Darcy even more unbelievably perfect.
Multiple Choice:
Which quotation best describes Mrs. Gardiner’s opinion of Darcy?
A) “His behavior to us has, in every respect, been pleasing as when we were in Derbyshire. His understanding and opinions all please me” (315)
B) “I must say that I hate the very sight of him” (323).
C) “Silent, grave and indifferent” (328).
D) “Everybody declared that he was the wickedest young man in the world; and everybody began to find out, that they had always distrusted the appearance of his goodness” (285).
E) “His countenance, voice, and manner, had established him at once in the possession of every virtue” (203).
Monday, April 6, 2009
P&P #12: Ch. 7-9
“To know that her daughter would be married was enough. She was disturbed by no fear for her felicity, nor humbled by any remembrance of her misconduct” (296).
- While Mr. Bennet is extremely grieved by the incident of Lydia’s sudden act of irrational and irresponsible behavior, Mrs. Bennet is overjoyed at simply the fact that her daughter is getting married. Mrs. Bennet is blind to disobedience and whore-like behavior as long as marriage is the result. This clearly demonstrates that Mrs. Bennet has indeed, made her purpose, or obsession, in life to marry off her daughters regardless of how it may come about. She is careless in her means of raising her daughters because instead of reprimanding Lydia for her wrongdoing, she congratulates her. Mr. Bennet, acting extremely fair and reasonable, chooses to stand his ground and not show affection whatsoever toward the marriage of Lydia and Wickham (300). Nevertheless, Mrs. Bennet, “was more alive to the disgrace, which her want of new clothes must reflect on her daughter’s nuptials, than to any sense of shame at her eloping and living with Wickham a fortnight before they took place” (300). It is evident that with having such an upbringing where marriage was always seen as priority, we can only conclude that Mrs. Bennet should be to blame for Lydia running off and ruining her life.
Multiple Choice:
Who is Elizabeth referring to in the following passage?
“She began to comprehend that he was exactly the man who, in disposition and talents, would most suit her. His understanding and temper, though unlike her own, would have answered all her wishes” (301).
A) Mr. Wickham
B) Mr. Darcy
C) Mr. Collins
D) Mr. Gardiner
E) Mr. Hurst
P&P #11: Ch. 3-6
“That loss of virtue in a female is irretrievable, that one false step involves her in endless ruin, that her reputation is no less brittle than it is beautiful, and that she cannot be too much guarded in her behaviour towards the undeserving of the other sex” (280).
- We do not come across Mary very often in the text; however, when she speaks it is often very insightful. She is known to be an intelligent reader that keeps to herself. When reading this passage, it is evident that Mary has intelligent explanations. She is indeed younger than both Jane and Lizzy, nevertheless, her intelligence level can be considered to have exceeded her age. She explicates Lydia’s situation as being a lesson to be learned so no one may commit the same mistake. Mary also illustrates one of the common themes in the novel—impressions. The society is extremely focused on social structure and how one is obligated to act. If this is not done, people will often speak badly of that person, which will eventually destroy their reputation. Just as, if the citizens are aware of how the marriage came about, people would begin to speak badly of not only her but her entire family. Lydia obviously did not think of the damage she would be causing. This could be considered a common case of the moral triangle where Lydia allowed for the end to justify the means.
Multiple Choice:
What type of emotion does Mr. Bennet evoke through the following passage?
“ ‘Say nothing of that. Who should suffer but myself? It has been my own doing, and I ought to feel it’” (289).
A) Guilt because he feels responsible for allowing Lydia to go
B) Anger because he had personally told her not to go
C) Sarcastic Happiness because he does not care for the foolish acts of his family
D) Indifferent because Lydia is marrying into wealth
E) None of the above
Huck Finn Essay
Macda Gerard
AP English 11: Mr. George
March 25, 2009
Huck Finn Essay
“Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12:2) Societal constraints have been a large influence on Huck’s life and behavior, but that soon changes with the renewal of his mind. In the novel, society is displayed as unjust and excessive. Miss Watson forced Huck to eat, speak, and think properly against his will. Pap allowed Huck to escape the formality of society, while still constraining Huck through his lenient influence, but also his violent nature. Both were responsible for molding Huck’s decision making, but also hindering his ability to think for himself up until he rids himself of the differing views and creates his own path. Society is demanding of Huck’s conformity, but ultimately fails, which gives him the opportunity of acting outside of the corrupted society.
Huck finds felicity and contentment in the woods because that is where he was raised and feels most comfortable. He did not have the luxury of attending school, nor of having nice clothes, so when such things are offered to him, Huck feels constricted and uncomfortable:
“The Widow Douglas she took me for her son, and allowed she would sivilize me; but it was rough living in the house all the time, considering how dismal regular and decent the widow was in all her ways; and so when I couldn't stand it no longer I lit out. I got into my old rags and my sugar-hogshead again, and was free and satisfied” (Twain 9).
At Miss Watson’s house, Huck was forced to act with great propriety and attend school. Proper etiquette and education were of the utmost importance, and valued over what Huck was taught by his father. One can hold the supposition that being educated and instructed on proper etiquette is what Miss Watson and the Widow Douglas believed was truly best for Huck; however, this does not prevent him from going against these restrictions and reverting back to what he is accustomed to.
Pap was indeed lenient in raising Huck; however, he was also partly responsible for influencing Huck’s decisions. Society calls for a high sense of propriety and good manners, but Pap and Huck were certainly lacking: “I didn’t want to go back no more. I had stopped cussing, because the widow didn’t like it; but now I took to it again because pap hadn’t no objections. It was pretty good times up in the woods there, take it all around” (34). Huck could do and say whatever he pleased without having to walk on eggshells. His rebellion against the proper rules and regulations of society is a direct result of the fact that he was not born into such a system. Nonetheless, Pap certainly held societal influenced beliefs that contributed to Huck formulating his own views.
Miss Watson and Pap unquestionably have differing opinions and values regarding a child’s upbringing. Pap shows this when recognizing that Huck is attending school: “You’re educated, too, they say; can read and write…I’ll take it out of you. Who told you you might meddle with such hifault’n foolishness, hey?” (29). Pap does not value education and good manners, while Miss Watson’s sole attempt for the betterment of Huck was through proper etiquette and education. While offering a contrasting view on manners, both Miss Watson and Pap share the same societal view about slavery.
With the enormous disparity of beliefs between Pap and Miss Watson, it is difficult to grasp how they could possibly agree on anything. Nonetheless, they both share common beliefs regarding slavery. Society teaches that slavery is acceptable and a necessity. It makes blacks subordinate to whites regardless of if a white man is at the top or bottom of the class structure. With Miss Watson and Pap disagreeing on the good part of society, but agreeing on the shameful aspects of society, one is forced to question the sensibleness of the belief. Slavery is such an abominable practice and for Miss Watson to disagree on the good and agree on owning human being, it makes slavery seen absurd. These influences certainly aid in Huck’s formulation of his own ideas.
Huck goes off on his own escaping societal pressures, and later finds refuge with Jim on the river. In every decision Huck makes, it is evident that he draws on the influences of Miss Watson and Pap, often attempting to find a mean between the disparate views. Doing so is not always successful and simply forces him to formulate his own morals and values: “Well, I says to myself at last, I’m agoing to chance it; I’ll up and tell the truth this time, though it does seem most like setting down on a kag of powder and touching it off just to see where you’ll go to” (200). Huck’s muddled moral process was unclear solely because of the many influences he had in his life. However, it is clear that Huck overcomes his muddled thought process and decides to go out on a limb and tell the truth for once: “here’s a case where I’m blest if it don’t look to me like the truth is better, and actuly safer, than a lie” (200). Huck forming his own thoughts can also be seen through his relationship with Jim.
Huck had always understood, from both Miss Watson and Pap, that slavery was a standard practice that was acceptable. However, when hearing such different views on other matters, and finally hearing an agreement on the subject of slavery, Huck is forced to reevaluate slavery and create his own opinion. Informing Tom of his plan, “ ‘You’ll say it’s a dirty low-down business; but what if it is—I’m low down; and I’m agoing to steal him, and I want you to keep mum and not let on’” (240), Huck is blatantly choosing to act against what society deems to be normal.
With the onset of Huck’s moral dilemma, he took on others’ opinions in decision making and determining what was good and bad. Escaping such influences placed Huck outside of society, which gave him the opportunity to make independent decisions. Huck’s bad upbringing gives him the opportunity to be just in an unjust society, ultimately resulting in his independence.
AP English 11: Mr. George
March 25, 2009
Huck Finn Essay
“Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind” (Romans 12:2) Societal constraints have been a large influence on Huck’s life and behavior, but that soon changes with the renewal of his mind. In the novel, society is displayed as unjust and excessive. Miss Watson forced Huck to eat, speak, and think properly against his will. Pap allowed Huck to escape the formality of society, while still constraining Huck through his lenient influence, but also his violent nature. Both were responsible for molding Huck’s decision making, but also hindering his ability to think for himself up until he rids himself of the differing views and creates his own path. Society is demanding of Huck’s conformity, but ultimately fails, which gives him the opportunity of acting outside of the corrupted society.
Huck finds felicity and contentment in the woods because that is where he was raised and feels most comfortable. He did not have the luxury of attending school, nor of having nice clothes, so when such things are offered to him, Huck feels constricted and uncomfortable:
“The Widow Douglas she took me for her son, and allowed she would sivilize me; but it was rough living in the house all the time, considering how dismal regular and decent the widow was in all her ways; and so when I couldn't stand it no longer I lit out. I got into my old rags and my sugar-hogshead again, and was free and satisfied” (Twain 9).
At Miss Watson’s house, Huck was forced to act with great propriety and attend school. Proper etiquette and education were of the utmost importance, and valued over what Huck was taught by his father. One can hold the supposition that being educated and instructed on proper etiquette is what Miss Watson and the Widow Douglas believed was truly best for Huck; however, this does not prevent him from going against these restrictions and reverting back to what he is accustomed to.
Pap was indeed lenient in raising Huck; however, he was also partly responsible for influencing Huck’s decisions. Society calls for a high sense of propriety and good manners, but Pap and Huck were certainly lacking: “I didn’t want to go back no more. I had stopped cussing, because the widow didn’t like it; but now I took to it again because pap hadn’t no objections. It was pretty good times up in the woods there, take it all around” (34). Huck could do and say whatever he pleased without having to walk on eggshells. His rebellion against the proper rules and regulations of society is a direct result of the fact that he was not born into such a system. Nonetheless, Pap certainly held societal influenced beliefs that contributed to Huck formulating his own views.
Miss Watson and Pap unquestionably have differing opinions and values regarding a child’s upbringing. Pap shows this when recognizing that Huck is attending school: “You’re educated, too, they say; can read and write…I’ll take it out of you. Who told you you might meddle with such hifault’n foolishness, hey?” (29). Pap does not value education and good manners, while Miss Watson’s sole attempt for the betterment of Huck was through proper etiquette and education. While offering a contrasting view on manners, both Miss Watson and Pap share the same societal view about slavery.
With the enormous disparity of beliefs between Pap and Miss Watson, it is difficult to grasp how they could possibly agree on anything. Nonetheless, they both share common beliefs regarding slavery. Society teaches that slavery is acceptable and a necessity. It makes blacks subordinate to whites regardless of if a white man is at the top or bottom of the class structure. With Miss Watson and Pap disagreeing on the good part of society, but agreeing on the shameful aspects of society, one is forced to question the sensibleness of the belief. Slavery is such an abominable practice and for Miss Watson to disagree on the good and agree on owning human being, it makes slavery seen absurd. These influences certainly aid in Huck’s formulation of his own ideas.
Huck goes off on his own escaping societal pressures, and later finds refuge with Jim on the river. In every decision Huck makes, it is evident that he draws on the influences of Miss Watson and Pap, often attempting to find a mean between the disparate views. Doing so is not always successful and simply forces him to formulate his own morals and values: “Well, I says to myself at last, I’m agoing to chance it; I’ll up and tell the truth this time, though it does seem most like setting down on a kag of powder and touching it off just to see where you’ll go to” (200). Huck’s muddled moral process was unclear solely because of the many influences he had in his life. However, it is clear that Huck overcomes his muddled thought process and decides to go out on a limb and tell the truth for once: “here’s a case where I’m blest if it don’t look to me like the truth is better, and actuly safer, than a lie” (200). Huck forming his own thoughts can also be seen through his relationship with Jim.
Huck had always understood, from both Miss Watson and Pap, that slavery was a standard practice that was acceptable. However, when hearing such different views on other matters, and finally hearing an agreement on the subject of slavery, Huck is forced to reevaluate slavery and create his own opinion. Informing Tom of his plan, “ ‘You’ll say it’s a dirty low-down business; but what if it is—I’m low down; and I’m agoing to steal him, and I want you to keep mum and not let on’” (240), Huck is blatantly choosing to act against what society deems to be normal.
With the onset of Huck’s moral dilemma, he took on others’ opinions in decision making and determining what was good and bad. Escaping such influences placed Huck outside of society, which gave him the opportunity to make independent decisions. Huck’s bad upbringing gives him the opportunity to be just in an unjust society, ultimately resulting in his independence.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
P&P #10: Ch. 19-2
“Her thoughts were all fixed on that one spot of Pemberly House, whichever it might be, where Mr. Darcy then was. She longed to know what at that moment was passing in his mind; in what manner he thought of her, and whether, in defiance of everything, she was still dear to him” (246).
- Elizabeth had never once wondered what Darcy thought of her. She never valued his supposed arrogant opinions or ideas—and never once did she ever expect this to change. However, this quote depicts this drastic change. Upon Elizabeth’s realization of Darcy’s true character, she shifts from having feelings of hatred and disdain toward Darcy, to respect and admiration. Elizabeth longs for some type of sign that may release her uncertainty of Darcy’s feelings for her through a glance or a mannerism. She wonders if Darcy still has feelings for her, but assumes and expresses certainty that he doesn’t: “It is impossible that he should still love me” (249). However, we gain insight from an outside source that, “it was evident that he was very much in love with her” (257). Elizabeth still remains unsure of her own feelings toward Darcy (258), let alone attempting to figure out Darcy’s.
Multiple Choice:
What are Elizabeth’s feelings on being acquainted with Miss Darcy?
A) Elizabeth felt that it was a compliment of the highest kind
B) Elizabeth dreaded the meeting because Miss Darcy proved to be arrogant
C) Mrs. Reynolds had spoken ill of Miss Darcy’s upbringing and persuaded Elizabeth not to speak with her
D) Indifference
E) Elizabeth was already well acquainted with Miss Darcy and despised her
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
P&P #9: Ch. 14-18
“The general prejudice against Mr. Darcy is so violent, that it would be the death of half the good people in Meryton, to attempt to place him in an amiable light” (221).
- Once again, the themes first impressions along with prejudice, appears. Elizabeth makes a great assumption in expressing that regardless of any new, good-natured information having to do with Darcy, the people will have an extremely difficult time believing Elizabeth. This is solely due to how society values first impressions. In observing one’s initial portrayal of character, permanent prejudices are formed—either positive or negative. This does not often prove successful: “Pleased with the preference of one, and offended by the neglect of the other, on the very beginning of our acquaintance, I have courted [prejudice] and ignorance, and driven reason away where either were concerned” (205). In this social structure, a person's disposition is already set according to their place, ones responsibility is to act in such a way that reflects on that social level. It is absurd at how many times this practice has failed them and the people still remain stagnant in changing their customs.
Multiple Choice:
What does Elizabeth choose to leave out when telling Jane of all that had occurred?
A) The devious schemes of Wickham
B) How Darcy professed his undying love for Elizabeth
C) That Darcy interfered with the possible relationship between Jane and Bingley
D) Mrs. Bennet and her sisters were responsible for manipulating Bingley into never coming back
E) All of the above
Monday, March 30, 2009
P&P #7: Ch. 6-10
"If his own vanity, however, did not mislead him, he was the cause, his pride and caprice were the cause of all that Jane had suffered and still continued to suffer. He had ruined for a while every hope of happiness for the most affectionate, generous heart in the world; and no one could say how lasting an evil he might have inflicted" (185).
"There is a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened at the will of others. My courage always rises with every attempt to intimidate me" (173).
The quotation above describes which character?
A) Elizabeth
B) Mrs. Bennet
C) Charlotte
D) Mr. Collins
E) Maria
- Elizabeth absolutely detests Darcy for interfering with the relationship between Mr. Bingley and her sister Jane. Elizabeth assumed that the Bingley sisters were solely responsible for the incident; however, when receiving this information she places Darcy at fault for all of Jane’s time spent suffering and crying. Mr. Darcy has fallen for Elizabeth and the two finally begin to get along, but with this new information, Mr. Darcy has lost his chance to gain Elizabeth’s approval, only to result in a deepening of her abhorrence toward him.
Multiple Choice:
"There is a stubbornness about me that never can bear to be frightened at the will of others. My courage always rises with every attempt to intimidate me" (173).
The quotation above describes which character?
A) Elizabeth
B) Mrs. Bennet
C) Charlotte
D) Mr. Collins
E) Maria
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
